四、結(jié)語(yǔ)
中美兩國(guó)的地方領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者能夠脫穎而出,成為地方一把手,在這一過(guò)程中其自身的成長(zhǎng)路徑選擇和領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力發(fā)展過(guò)程都具有一定的共性。一方面,他們都非常注重自我提升,無(wú)論是選擇離開家鄉(xiāng)發(fā)展,變換工作地點(diǎn),還是繼續(xù)學(xué)習(xí)深造等都是充實(shí)、提升自己的表現(xiàn);另一方面,他們都能夠依據(jù)國(guó)內(nèi)外環(huán)境的變化、時(shí)代的進(jìn)步和發(fā)展不斷調(diào)整自己的發(fā)展方向和成長(zhǎng)路徑,例如再學(xué)習(xí)中專業(yè)的選擇,前期積累階段職業(yè)和職位的選擇等都是一種適應(yīng)性的發(fā)展方式。由此可見,無(wú)論在中國(guó)還是美國(guó),即使存在地域文化和意識(shí)形態(tài)上的差異,但是領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者自身的成長(zhǎng)路徑和領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力發(fā)展的模式和過(guò)程都是大同小異的,那些能夠走上領(lǐng)導(dǎo)崗位的人勢(shì)必是兼具前期的努力和日后的補(bǔ)充,領(lǐng)先于他人捕捉到所在領(lǐng)域的潮流和趨勢(shì),提前做好準(zhǔn)備,并在日后審時(shí)度勢(shì),不斷調(diào)整自己的發(fā)展路線,集聚各方面優(yōu)勢(shì),這樣便會(huì)一直走在前端,成為名副其實(shí)的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者。
參考文獻(xiàn):
[1][9]Cheng Li & Bachman.D,Localism.Elitismand Immobilism:Elite Formation and Social Change in Post-Mao China.World Politics,Vol.42,No.1,1989(10).
[2][16]Zang Xiaowei.Provincial Elite in Post-Mao China.Asian Survey,1991(6).
[3][8]Lee Hongyung.From Revolutionary Cadres toParty Technocrats in Socialist China.Berkeley:University of California Press,1991.
[4][15]徐湘林.后毛時(shí)代的精英轉(zhuǎn)換和依附性技術(shù)官僚的興起[J].戰(zhàn)略與管理,2001(6).Xu Xianglin.Elite Transformation and the Rise of Dependent Technocrats in Post-Mao Era.Strategy and Management,2001(6).
[5]戰(zhàn)偉萍,于永達(dá).干部晉升與職業(yè)路徑關(guān)系探析——以市委書記群體為例[J].中國(guó)人力資源開發(fā),2011(7).Zhan Weiping & Yu Yongda.Relationship between Career Path and Promotion of Cadres:Research on City Party Secretaries.Human Resource Developmentof China,2011(7).
[6]熊義志.國(guó)家戰(zhàn)略轉(zhuǎn)型與省委書記任職資歷和職業(yè)模式變遷研究[J].領(lǐng)導(dǎo)科學(xué),2011(7).Xiong Yizhi.Research on the National Strategic Transformation and the Change of Seniority and Career Patterns of Provincial Secretaries.Leadership Science,2011(7).
[7]馮軍旗.中縣干部[D].北京大學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)系博士論文,2010.Feng Junqi.Zhong Countys Cadre.PhD Thesis.Sociology Department.Peking University,2010.
[10]Sigelman.L,Dometrius. NC.Governors as Chief Administrators:The Linkage Between Formal Powers and Informal Influence American.Politics Research,Vol.16,No.2,1988(4).[11][21][25].Hamman.JA.Career Experience and Performing Effectively as Governor.American Review of Public Administration,Vol.34No.2,2004(6).
[12]King.JD,Hamman.JA,Cohen.JE.Prior Political Experience and Gubernatorial Popularity the Fifth Annual State Politics and Policy Conference,EastLansing,Michigan,2005-05-13.
[13]王登峰,崔紅.中國(guó)基層黨政領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部的勝任特征與跨文化比較[J].北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版),2006[11].Wang Dengfeng,Cui Hong.Competency Model for Chinese Local Government Executives and Its Cross-Cultural Comparation,Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences),2006(11).
[14]Dorfman.PW,Howell.JP.Leadership in Westernand Asian Countries:Commonalities and Differencein Effective Leadership Progresses Across Cultures,Leadership Quarterly,Vol.8,No.3,1997.
[17]Schlesinger.JA.Lawyers and American Politics:AClarified View.Midwest Journal of Political Science,Vol.1,No.1 1957(5).
[18]Hain.PL &Piereson.JE.Lawyers and Politics Revisited:Structural Advantages of Lawyer-Politicians.American Journal of Political Science,Vol.19,No.1,1975(2).
光明日?qǐng)?bào)社概況 | 關(guān)于光明網(wǎng) | 報(bào)網(wǎng)動(dòng)態(tài) | 聯(lián)系我們 | 法律聲明 | 光明網(wǎng)郵箱 | 網(wǎng)站地圖
光明網(wǎng)版權(quán)所有