[參考文獻]
[References]
[1]左然.國外中央政府機構設置研究[J].中國行政管理,2006(4).
Zuo Ran. Study on the Setting of the Foreign Central Government Agencies. Chinese Public Administration,2006 (4).
[2]宋世明.論大部門體制的基本構成要素[J].中國行政管理,2009(10).
Song Shiming. The Basic Elements of Super-ministry System. Chinese Public Administration,2009 (10).
[3]汪玉凱.冷靜看待“大部制”改革[N].中國經濟時報,2007-12-10.
Wang Yukai. Staying Calm to View the Super-ministry Reform. China Economic Times,2007-12-10.
[4]馬英.大部制改革與政府職能的轉變[J].云南行政學院學報,2008(4).
Ma Ying.The Super-ministry Reform and the Transformation of Government Functions. Journal of Yunnan Administration Institute,2008(4).
[5]白智立.日本行政改革比較研究[M].北京:國家行政學院出版社,2012.21.
Bai Zhili. A Comparative Study of the Administrative Reform in Japan. The CAG Press,2012.p21.
[6]楊敏.大部門體制的改革邏輯[J].決策,2007(11).
Yang Min. The Logic of Super-ministry Reform. The Decision,2007(11).
[7]中國共產黨第十八屆中央委員會第三次全體會議文件匯編[M].北京:人民出版社,2013.37.
Files of The Third Plenary Session of China Eighteenth CPC Central Committee. Beijing: The People’s Press,2013.p37.
[8]倪星.大部門體制:英法經驗與中國視角[J].天津行政學院學報,2008(1).
Ni Xing. Super-ministry System: The British and French Experience and China’s Perspective. Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute,2008(1).
[9][美]羅伯特·達爾.公共行政科學:三個問題[M].彭和平等譯.北京:中央黨校出版社,1997.161.
Robert Dahl. The Science of Public Administration: Three Problems. Trans. by Peng Heping et al. The Publishing House of the Central Party School,1997.p161.
[10]李景鵬.權力政治學[M].哈爾濱:黑龍江教育出版社,1995.
Li Jingpeng. Power Politics. Heilongjiang Education Publishing House,1995.
[11]樊鵬.發達國家和地區大部門體制組織結構與運行機制比較[J].經濟社會體制比較,2011(1).
Fan Peng. The Comparison of Super-ministry System Organizational Structures and Operating Mechanisms among Developed Countries and Regions. Comparative Studies of Economic and Social Systems,2011(1).
[12]竺乾威.國外大部門體制:推進方法和特點[N].經濟日報,2008-02-29.
Zhu Qianwei. The Foreign Super-ministry System: The Propulsion Methods and Characteristics. Economic Daily, 2008-02-29.
Five misunderstandings about the reform of super-ministry system
Zhao ZijianSong Shiming
[Abstract]In the current discussion on the implementation of the Super-Ministry System, there are five misunderstandings of the nature. Based on the analysis and criticism of the misunderstandings, this paper presents that the nature of super-ministry system is the recombination of government structures and the reengineering of government operation mechanisms; promoting the construction of service government is the basic purpose of the implementation of the super-ministry system; interaction and mutual promotion are the basic relationship between the transformation of government functions and the implementation of super-ministry system; the propulsion mode must be the combination of the top design and the basic exploration ; China implementation of super-ministry system has its unique individuality.
[Key words]super-ministry system, government function, service-oriented government, top design
[Authors]Zhao Zijian is Postdoctoral of Chinese Academy of Governance; Song Shiming is Professor of Chinese Academy of Governance. Beijing 100089